Thursday, June 27, 2002

Distance Education

Over on the RadCat (Radical Cataloging) list there has been some discussion about justification for cataloging in light of pre-processed books. It has been mentioned that it would be nice to have someone check the cataloging, there are often mistakes. Also mentioned was there is a need for local decisions based on the users of a particular library. Another reason would be distant users. As we put our catalogs on the Web and begin serving remote users and as the push for distance education becomes stronger better cataloging will be necessary.

A remote patron cannot check out the book on the shelf and waste a few minutes if it does not suit their requirements. They must either make a trip to the collection or have the item sent to them. Either way it could be a significant investment in time for either the library or the user. Inclusion of a summary note and/or the table of contents would pay for itself if only used once to decide the item was not what was wanted. To serve the distance learning community our records need to be richer and more descriptive.

Later this summer I'll be attending a workshop on distance learning. The place of good cataloging in that context is sure to be an impotant topic. Post a comment if you work with distance students.